670 research outputs found
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence
Peer reviewedPublisher PD
Diagnostic tools for alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias: an overview of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) systematic reviews
Background: Dementia includes a group of neurodegenerative disorders characterized by progressive loss of cognitive function and a decrease in the ability to perform activities of daily living. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) focus on how well the index test detects patients with the disease in terms of figures such as
sensitivity and specificity. Although DTA reviews about dementia are essential, at present there is no information about their quantity and quality.
Methods: We searched for DTA reviews in MEDLINE (1966–2013), EMBASE (1980–2013), The Cochrane Library (from its inception until December 2013) and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE). Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the reviews using the AMSTAR measurement tool, and the quality of the reporting using the PRISMA checklist. We describe the main characteristics of these reviews, including basic characteristics, type of dementia, and diagnostic test evaluated, and we summarize the AMSTAR and PRISMA scores.
Results: We selected 24 DTA systematic reviews. Only 10 reviews (41.6%), assessed the bias of included studies and few (33%) used this information to report the review results or to develop their conclusions Only one review (4%) reported all methodological items suggested by the PRISMA tool. Assessing methodology quality by means of the AMSTAR tool, we found that six DTA reviews (25%) pooled primary data with the aid of methods that are used for intervention reviews, such as Mantel-Haenszel and separate random-effects models (25%), while five reviews (20.8%)
assessed publication bias by means of funnel plots and/or Egger’s Test.
Conclusions: Our assessment of these DTA reviews reveals that their quality, both in terms of methodology and
reporting, is far from optimal. Assessing the quality of diagnostic evidence is fundamental to determining the validity of the operating characteristics of the index test and its usefulness in specific settings. The development of high quality DTA systematic reviews about dementia continues to be a challeng
Extending the RIGHT statement for reporting adapted practice guidelines in healthcare: the RIGHT-Ad@pt Checklist protocol
Evidence-based medicine; Guideline adaptation; Guidelines as topicMedicina basada en la evidencia; Adaptación de guías clínicas; Guías clínicasMedicina basada en l'evidència; Adaptació de guies clíniques; Guies clíniquesIntroduction: The adaptation of guidelines is an increasingly used methodology for the efficient development of contextualised recommendations. Nevertheless, there is no specific reporting guidance. The essential Reporting Items of Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) statement could be useful for reporting adapted guidelines, but it does not address all the important aspects of the adaptation process. The objective of our project is to develop an extension of the RIGHT statement for the reporting of adapted guidelines (RIGHTAd@pt Checklist). Methods and analysis: To develop the RIGHT-Ad@pt Checklist, we will use a multistep process that includes:
(1) establishment of a Working Group; (2) generation of an initial checklist based on the RIGHT statement; (3) optimisation of the checklist (an initial assessment of
adapted guidelines, semistructured interviews, a Delphi consensus survey, an external review by guideline developers and users and a final assessment of adapted
guidelines); and (4) approval of the final checklist. At each step of the process, we will calculate absolute frequencies and proportions, use content analysis to summarise and draw conclusions, discuss the results, draft a report and refine the checklist. Ethics and dissemination: We have obtained a waiver of approval from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee at the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Barcelona, Spain). We will disseminate the RIGHT-Ad@pt Checklist by publishing into a peer-reviewed journal, presenting to relevant stakeholders and translating into different languages. We will continuously seek feedback from stakeholders, surveil new relevant evidence and, if necessary, update the checklist.YS is funded by China Scholarship Council (No 201707040103). LMG is funded by a Miguel Servet contract from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CP18/00007)
The development of clinical guidelines in China : insights from a national survey
Previous research suggests that the quality of clinical guidelines (CGs) in China is suboptimal. However, little is known about the methodology that CGs follow. We conducted a national survey of methods used by Chinese CG developers for CG development, adaptation, and updating. We used a previously piloted questionnaire based on methodologies of CG development, adaptation, and updating, which was distributed during September-November 2020 to 114 organizations identified from published Chinese CGs (searched 2017-2020), recommended by Chinese CG developers, and recommended by clinical discipline experts. We collected 48 completed questionnaires (42.1% response). Most organizations developed CGs based on scientific evidence (89.6%), existing CGs (75%), or expert experience and opinion (64.6%). Only a few organizations had a specific CG development division (6.3%), a CG monitoring plan (on clinicians 33.3%; on patients 18.8%), funding (33.3%), or a conflict-of-interest (COI) management policy (23.4%). Thirty (62.5%) organizations reported using a CG development methodology handbook, from international organizations (14/30, 46.7%), methodology or evaluation resources (3/30, 10.0%), expert experience and opinion (3/30, 10.0%), or in-house handbooks (3/30, 10.0%). One organization followed a published adaptation methodology. Thirty-eight organizations (88.4%) reported de novo CG development: 21 (55.3%) formed a CG working group, and 29 (76.3%) evaluated the quality of evidence (21 [72.4%] using a methodological tool). Nineteen organizations (52.8%) reported CG adaptation: three (31.6%) had an adaptation working group, and 12 (63.2%) evaluated the quality of source CGs (2 (16.7%) using the AGREE II instrument). Thirty-three organizations (68.8%) updated their CGs, seven (17.5%) using a formal updating process. Our study describes how CGs are developed in a middle-income country like China. To ensure better healthcare, there is still an important need for improvement in the development, adaptation, and updating of CG in China. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00799-7
Strategies for monitoring and updating clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review
Background: Scientific knowledge is in constant change. The flow of new information requires a frequent
re-evaluation of the available research results. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are not exempted from this
phenomenon and need to be kept updated to maintain the validity of their recommendations. The objective of
our review is to systematically identify, describe and assess strategies for monitoring and updating CPGs.
Study design and setting: We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating one or more methods of
updating (with or without monitoring) CPGs or recommendations. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed) and The
Cochrane Methodology Register (The Cochrane Library) from 1966 to June 2012. Additionally, we hand-searched
reference lists of the included studies and the Guidelines International Network book of abstracts. If necessary, we
contacted study authors to obtain additional information.
Results: We included a total of eight studies. Four evaluated if CPGs were out of date, three updated CPGs, and
one continuously monitored and updated CPGs. The most detailed reported phase of the process was the
identification of new evidence. As opposed to studies updating guidelines, studies evaluating if CPGs were out of
date applied restricted searches. Only one study compared a restricted versus an exhaustive search suggesting that
a restricted search is sufficient to assess recommendations’ Validity. One study analyzed the survival time of CPGs
and suggested that these should be reassessed every three years.
Conclusions: There is limited evidence about the optimal strategies for monitoring and updating clinical practice
guidelines. A restricted search is likely to be sufficient to monitor new evidence and assess the need to update,
however, more information is needed about the timing and type of search. Only the exhaustive search strategy has
been assessed for the update of CPGs. The development and evaluation of more efficient strategies is needed to
improve the timeliness and reduce the burden of maintaining the validity of CPGs.
Keywords: Clinical practice guidelines, Diffusion of innovation, Evidence-based medicine, Information storage and
retrieval, Methodology, Updating, Implementation science, Dissemination and implementation, Knowledge translation
Quality Assessment of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prescription of Antidepressant Drugs During Pregnancy
Antidepressant use during the gestational period remains a controversial issue. The objective of this study was to appraise the quality of the available clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that includes recommendations for antidepressant use during pregnancy. We systematically searched for documents published between January 2000 and September 2010 in MEDLINE / TRIP database and on clearinghouses and main scientific societies websites. Four appraisers evaluated each guideline using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation tool (AGREE II). Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated as an overall indicator of agreement. Twelve CPGs were included from a total of 539 references. Only two guidelines were specifically addressed to pregnant women. The overall agreement among reviewers was high (ICC: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98). The mean scores and standard deviation (SD) for each of the AGREE II domains were: scope and purpose: 84.4% (12); stakeholder involvement: 67.4% (29.8); rigor of development: 68.6% (19.8); clarity and presentation: 83.4% (17.4); applicability: 44% (37.3); and editorial independence: 62.1% (30.4). After standardizing the scores of the 12 guidelines, 5 were considered as being “recommended”, 5 as “recommended with modifications, and 2 as “not recommended”. Among the five recommended guidelines, two were specifically conceived to the gestational period. CPGs containing recommendations for antidepressant use during pregnancy were of moderate to high quality. Future guidelines should take into account the observed drawbacks in some domains, and specifically focus a more in depth approach of depression during pregnanc
Attitudes and perceptions of medical students about family medicine in Spain: protocol for a cross-sectional survey
Background: Despite the fact that family medicine
(FM) has become established as a specialty in the past
25 years, this has not been reflected in the inclusion of
the specialty in the majority of medical schools in
Spain. Almost 40% of the students will work in primary
care but, in spite of this, most universities do not have
an assessed placement as such. There are only
specific practice periods in health centres or some
student-selected components with little weight in the
overall curricula.
Objectives: To evaluate the attitudes and perceptions
of medical students about FM in the health system and
their perception about the need for specific training in
FM at the undergraduate level. To explore change over
time of these attitudes and perceptions and to examine
potential predictive factors for change. Finally, we will
review what teaching activity in FM is offered across
the Spanish schools of medicine.
Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional survey. Each
one of the different analyses will consist of two
surveys: one for all the students in the first, third and
fifth year of medical school in all the Spanish schools
of medicine asking about their knowledge, perceptions
and attitudes in relation to primary care and FM. There
will be an additional survey for the coordinating faculty
of the study in each university about the educational
activities related to FM that are carried out in their
centres. The repetition of the study every 2 years will
allow for an analysis of the evolution of the cohort of
students until they receive their degree and the
potential predictive factors.
Discussion: This study will provide useful information
for strategic planning decisions, content and
educational methodology in medical schools in Spain
and elsewhere. It will also help to evaluate the
influence of the ongoing changes in FM, locally and at
the European level, on the attitudes and perceptions of
the students towards FM in SpainThis project is funded with a grant from the Instituto de Salud Carlos
III, Ministerio de Sanidad, Spain (PI070975). PA-C is funded by a Miguel
Servet contract by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CP09/00137)
Teaching and learning how to make informed health choices: Protocol for a context analysis in Spanish primary schools
Salut dels nens; Pensament crític; Educació per a la salutSalud de los niños; Pensamiento crítico; Educación para la saludChildren’s health; Critical thinking; Health educationIntroduction
The Informed Health Choices (IHC) project developed learning resources to teach primary school children (10 to 12-year-olds) to assess treatment claims and make informed health choices. The aim of our study is to explore the educational context for teaching and learning critical thinking about health in Spanish primary schools.
Methods
During the 2020-2021 school year, we will conduct 1) a systematic assessment of educational documents and resources, and 2) semi-structured interviews with key education and health stakeholders. In the systematic assessment of educational documents and resources, we will include state and autonomous communities’ curriculums, school educational projects, and commonly used textbooks and other health teaching materials. In the semi-structured interviews, we will involve education and health policy makers, developers of learning resources, developers of health promotion and educational interventions, head teachers, teachers, families, and paediatric primary care providers. We will design and pilot a data extraction form and a semi-structured interview guide to collect the data. We will perform a quantitative and a qualitative analysis of the data to explore how critical thinking about health is being taught and learned in Spanish primary schools.
Conclusion
We will identify opportunities for and barriers to teaching and learning critical thinking about health in Spanish primary schools. We will formulate recommendations—for both practice and research purposes—on how to use, adapt (if needed), and implement the IHC resources in this context.This study will be funded by Institute of Health Carlos III through the project 'PI19/00068' (co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund/European Social Fund, 'Investing in your future'). LMG has a Miguel Servet research contract from the Institute of Health Carlos III [CP18/00007] (co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund/European Social Fund, 'Investing in your future')
Alzheimer’s Disease Dementia Guidelines for Diagnostic Testing: A Systematic Review
Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD dementia) is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases worldwide, with a growing incidence during the last decades. Clinical diagnosis of cognitive impairment and presence of AD biomarkers have become important issues for early and adequate treatment. We performed a systematic literature search and quality appraisal of AD dementia guidelines, published between 2005 and 2011, which contained diagnostic recommendations on AD dementia. We also analyzed diagnostic recommendations related to the use of brief cognitive tests, neuropsychological evaluation, and AD biomarkers. Of the 537 retrieved references, 15 met the selection criteria. We found that Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE)-II domains such as applicability and editorial independence had the lowest scores. The wide variability on assessment of quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were the main concerns identified regarding diagnostic testing. Although the appropriate methodology for clinical practice guideline development is well known, the quality of diagnostic AD dementia guidelines can be significantly improved
- …